Ruling by
Milan D. Smith Jr.Lower Court
USDC Central District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
Philip S. GutierrezLitigation activities under CEQA that resulted in a settlement were not objectively baseless and therefore protected under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Real Estate/Development, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
9th Circuit reaffirms expansive First Amendment petition rights in real estate lawsuit
Sep. 30, 2024
By Jillian N. London, Marissa Mulligan, Eric Richardson
By Jillian N. London, Marissa Mulligan, Eric Richardson
