Ruling by
Elizabeth A. GrimesLower Court
Los Angeles County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Ronald F. FrankPlaintiff's fraud claims did not arise from protected speech, but rather from the alleged misconduct that occurred after defendant encouraged plaintiff to donate.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Constitutional Law, Civil Rights
None of our business: Recent anti-SLAPP cases on the distinctions between public and private issues
MCLE
May 24, 2024
By Ashfaq G. Chowdhury
Constitutional Law, California Courts of Appeal
The Anti-SLAPP statute's catchall provision - real or contrived 'public issues'
Aug. 9, 2024
By Susan Allison
By Susan Allison
