Ruling by
Ronald M. GouldLower Court
USDC Northern District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
Yvonne Gonzalez RogersReasonable consumer would not have been deceived by ambiguous front label on products where the back labels both clarified the front label's meaning and provided an ingredients list.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Litigation & Arbitration
An ‘ambiguity’ defense in ‘clean beauty’ litigation?
Jan. 12, 2024
By Alexander M. Smith
By Alexander M. Smith
Labor/Employment, Environmental & Energy, Corporate
Courts are increasingly wary of ‘feel-good’ green marketing claims
Jan. 12, 2024
By Christina V. Tusan
By Christina V. Tusan
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
The Ninth Circuit’s ‘ambiguity’ rule just became even more ambiguous
Jul. 30, 2024
By Alexander M. Smith
By Alexander M. Smith
