Ruling by
Alison M. TucherLower Court
San Francisco County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Ethan P. SchulmanInsurer was not obliged to defend insured against tenants' lawsuit because tenants' claims were excluded under policy's provision excluding liability for violations of insured's duty of habitability.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Real Estate/Development, Government
Closing a habitability exclusion loophole
Sep. 13, 2022
By Stephen L. Raucher
By Stephen L. Raucher
