Proposition 57, which required a hearing to determine if offenses should be heard in juvenile court, applied retroactively to defendant's nonfinal case since his sentence was vacated on habeas corpus.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Judges and Judiciary, Criminal, California Supreme Court
Cascading retroactivity
Dec. 3, 2024
By Brian M. Hoffstadt
By Brian M. Hoffstadt
Obituaries
Farewell to an appellate giant who never sought the spotlight
Dec. 8, 2025
By Jennifer Hansen
By Jennifer Hansen
