Exception to rule that court may not set aside arbitration award did not apply because arbitrator did not enforce illegal contract, instead, arbitrator severed unlawful legal services rendered on contract.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, California Courts of Appeal, Alternative Dispute Resolution
Pandemic-era appellate rulings take on arbitration issues
MCLE
Apr. 22, 2021
By Neville L. Johnson, Douglas L. Johnson
Entertainment & Sports, Civil Litigation, California Courts of Appeal, Alternative Dispute Resolution
Ruling gives attorneys monopoly over talent negotiations
May 14, 2021
By Rick Siegel
By Rick Siegel
