Ruling by
Joshua P. GrobanLower Court
California Courts of AppealLower Court Judge
Richard M. AronsonSpecial statutory procedures that govern public entity's exercise of power of eminent domain are inapplicable in inverse condemnation actions, which instead proceed by rules governing ordinary civil actions.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Land Use, Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court
Ruling draws artificial distinction between eminent domain and inverse condemnation
Jul. 27, 2020
By Mark S. Roth
By Mark S. Roth
