South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Gavin Newsom

Lower Court

USDC Southern District of California

In evaluating a motion for an injunction pending appeal, we consider whether the moving party has demonstrated that they are likely to succeed on the merits, that they are likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in their favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Already a subscriber?
Sign In

Filter by date

Exact Phrase

Not the words

At least one of the words

All the words

South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Gavin Newsom

Lower Court

Related Content

U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, Civil Rights

U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law

Government, Constitutional Law, Civil Rights

U.S. Supreme Court, Intellectual Property, Government, Constitutional Law

U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law

Constitutional Law

Covid Columns, Constitutional Law

U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law

U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law

Constitutional Law, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Constitutional Law

Constitutional Law, Civil Litigation

Constitutional Law, Civil Litigation