Ruling by
Carol A. CorriganLower Court
California Courts of AppealLower Court Judge
Henry E. Needham Jr.Witness observations of names and logos were not hearsay because they were relevant to prove disputed link between defendant and pipes and were not offered for truth of their content.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, California Courts of Appeal, Appellate Practice
Evidence: An eternal struggle?
May 28, 2020
By Nicole Kim, Gary A. Watt
By Nicole Kim, Gary A. Watt
Civil Litigation
The hearsay rule and a re-introduction to Evidence I
Jun. 11, 2020
By Michael D. Marcus
By Michael D. Marcus
California Courts of Appeal, Appellate Practice
The $1.6 million question:When is an out-of-court statement not hearsay?
Jun. 22, 2020
By Sarah Hofstadter
By Sarah Hofstadter
Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court
A few 2020 California Supreme Court cases for civil litigators
MCLE
Dec. 9, 2020
By Maribel Lopez, Gary A. Watt
Evidence
Back-to-school hearsay quiz: Your California evidence law refresher
Sep. 8, 2025
By Ashfaq G. Chowdhury
By Ashfaq G. Chowdhury
