Ruling by
Jay S. BybeeLower Court
USDC Northern District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
William H. Orrick IIIDr. Pepper not in violation of Consumer Fraud by labeling sodas 'diet' because reasonable consumers understand 'diet' soda does not promise weight loss or health benefits.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation
Fraud claims against Diet Dr. Pepper dismissed under reasonable consumer test
Jan. 13, 2020
By Pooja S. Nair
By Pooja S. Nair
Civil Litigation
Becerra v. Dr Pepper/Seven Up: A victory over the space aliens
Feb. 11, 2020
By August T. Horvath
By August T. Horvath
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
The Ninth Circuit’s ‘ambiguity’ rule just became even more ambiguous
Jul. 30, 2024
By Alexander M. Smith
By Alexander M. Smith
