Ruling by
Richard A. PaezLower Court
USDC Northern District of CaliforniaLower Court Judge
Joseph C. SperoPlaintiffs satisfied class certification requirements of FRCP 23(a), 23(b)(3), and 23(b)(2), in light of plaintiffs' extensive representative evidence admissible under 'Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo.'
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Labor/Employment, Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court
Do state wage laws apply to workers here for just a day?
Feb. 27, 2020
By David E. Mastagni, Isaac Sean Stevens
By David E. Mastagni, Isaac Sean Stevens
U.S. Supreme Court, Entertainment & Sports
Minor leaguers get go-ahead from US high court for pay lawsuit
Oct. 6, 2020
By Craig Anderson
By Craig Anderson
