Ruling by
Carol A. CorriganLower Court
San Diego County Superior CourtAnti-SLAPP statute permits consideration of affidavit equivalents such as change of plea forms and the incorporated factual narratives if made under penalty of California's perjury laws and if admissible at trial.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court
What a court can consider when ruling on anti-SLAPP
Mar. 6, 2019
By Gregory M. Smith
By Gregory M. Smith
Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court, Appellate Practice
Projected admissibility
Mar. 18, 2019
By Curtis E.A. Karnow
By Curtis E.A. Karnow
Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court, Appellate Practice
Proper submission of pre-trial evidence: The twin hurdles
Mar. 18, 2019
By Kasey Curtis, Charles Hyun
By Kasey Curtis, Charles Hyun
Civil Litigation
Summary judgment after Sweetwater: Motions denied?
MCLE
Jan. 17, 2020
By Rosanna W. Gan, Gary A. Watt
