Dutta v. State Farm

Ruling by

Lower Court

USDC Northern District of California

Lower Court Judge

Where submitted evidence shows applicant was duly denied employment based on consumer credit report information, plaintiff cannot maintain FCRA claim based on hirer's failure to provide timely notice to applicant of discovered adverse information.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Already a subscriber?
Sign In

Filter by date

Exact Phrase

Not the words

At least one of the words

All the words

Dutta v. State Farm

Ruling by

Lower Court

Lower Court Judge

Enewsletter Sign-up

Related Content

Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

9th Circuit raises bar for Article III Standing