Per longstanding precedent, unnamed class member must either timely intervene or move to set aside or vacate trial court judgment in order to secure right to appeal.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court
Class action majority rejected
Feb. 2, 2018
By Marcos D. Sasso
By Marcos D. Sasso
Civil Litigation, California Supreme Court, Appellate Practice
Time to rethink limits on appeals by class action objectors
Apr. 20, 2018
By Ari J. Stiller
By Ari J. Stiller
Civil Litigation, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Ruling breathes new life into nationwide class actions
Jun. 11, 2019
By Eduardo Santos, Ryan Wu
By Eduardo Santos, Ryan Wu
