This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment,
Alternative Dispute Resolution

Feb. 6, 2026

When arbitration agreements go too far: Lessons from Cook and Ramirez

Recent California decisions underscore that while courts favor arbitration, overly aggressive employer-drafted agreements risk unenforceability when they compromise fairness.

David I. Brown

Arbitrator, Mediator and Special Master
JAMS

UC Davis School of Law

See more...

When arbitration agreements go too far: Lessons from <i>Cook</i> and <i>Ramirez</i>
Shutterstock

Both federal and California law embody a strong policy favoring the enforcement of arbitration agreements. The Federal Arbitration Act reflects a congressional determination that arbitration provides a speedy, economical and efficient forum for dispute resolution. California courts have long echoed this preference, recognizing arbitration as a valuable alternative to the congestion and expense of trad...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up