A complaint filed in Sacramento claims a tool used to evaluate female sex offenders is invalid and should not be used.
Similar tools are widely utilized in California and elsewhere to determine how likely male sex offenders are to commit new crimes if released and how closely they should be supervised. But the Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws argued that women reoffend at such low rates they cannot be statistically measured with accuracy.
The petition challe...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In