Immigration,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Jul. 25, 2019
Split 9th Circuit panel rules crossing border illegally doesn’t always mean eluding officers
The 9th U.S. District Court of Appeals somewhat begrudgingly reversed a misdemeanor conviction of an immigrant who crossed the border illegally, deeming the charge of “elud[ing] examination of inspection by immigration officers” to only be valid at a port of entry.
The 9th U.S. District Court of Appeals reversed a misdemeanor conviction of an immigrant who crossed the border illegally, deeming the charge of "elud[ing] examination of inspection by immigration officers" to only be valid at a port of entry.
Judge Jay S. Bybee authored the decision for the three-judge panel, which included Judges $95
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
