Kabateck, representing the Uber driver behind the lawsuit that attacked the company's business model and led to the $100 million settlement announced in April, is seeking to throw a monkey wrench at the deal. On May 11, Kabateck and two colleagues filed a strongly worded objection in the Northern District contending the "collusive and disastrous settlement" is nothing more than a $1 billion wage theft from drivers, in part becaus...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In