This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Large Firms

Sep. 19, 2015

When the ship sinks, Jewel surfaces

The ability of rainmakers to move between firms has always been an important selling point. But rainmakers often hit their heads against the provisions of Jewel v. Boxer. By J. Randolph Evans and Shari Klevens


By J. Randolph Evans and Shari Klevens


As law firm failures and mergers continue with increasing frequency, many firms experience
the unexpected departure of profitable partners. Needless to say, the consequences
of those departures can be significant.


The ability of rainmakers to move between firms has always been an important selling
point. But rainmakers seeking to make a move often ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up