This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court

Mar. 5, 2014

Bad facts meet the Fourth Amendment in hard case

In the wake of the U.S. high court's ruling in Fernandez v. California, many are writing the Fourth Amendment's obituary. By Jacqueline Goodman


By Jacqueline Goodman


Previously the U.S. Supreme Court has held that, for joint occupants of the same place, the presence of one objecting co-occupant was enough to deny consent to a warrantless search of the premises. Last week, however, the court ruled that in such a situation, police may remove the objecting co-occupant. Problem solved.


The rule was laid out in Fernandez v. California, 2014 DJDAR 2222 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2014). In Fernandez...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up